To attract the audience, the author basically needs to make
a strong argument about the injustices that are currently being debated
concerning education. The author keeps the audience interested by giving
statistic after statistic providing an overwhelming amount of proof of these
injustices.
The basic argument is that education needs to be improved
and have a much better quality. Education is “facing challenges in preparing
students for success.” The assumptions the argument relies on are that the
audience is currently aware of the problems with education in Texas and that
the audience is just as concerned as the author about the problems with
education.
The values held are children and their futures. The author
doesn’t clearly state what government should do to improve the current state of
education. They don’t provide a solution or a suggestion on how to fix the
problem. The important terms regarding the problems education faces are clear.
The author provides the proof with statistics.
I believe the argument was a success because it convinced me
that “Texas is
not producing enough high school graduates with the skills needed to succeed in
college or the workplace.” The argument doesn’t change my mind or beliefs
because I currently feel the same way regarding education. The argument
reinforces my current beliefs. The conclusion is that regardless of the “recent
educational improvements” many students are still failing. They go on to
college or the workplace and are unsuccessful or even struggle to keep up.
The political significance is that Texas government should be very concerned
with our future generations. This supports my understanding of the way the
political world works: which is that education is put on the back burner. The political
world’s choices affect the budget. It affects where Texas is actually putting
funds that it’s currently cutting from education. The truth is we are all in
this together. Let’s elevate our future by putting more funds to invest in
education.
No comments:
Post a Comment